Select Page

Agentless Backups vs Agent Based Backups: Which is Best?

Agentless Backups vs Agent-based backups

System administrators must make an important decision to evaluate and determine what works best for your customers. In addition to fulfilling the core mission of data protection for business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR), choosing between agent-based and non-agent backup can impact your bottom line.

Today, a physical server typically hosts many virtual machines (VMs), and the portability of virtual machines allows them to easily move across on-premises and cloud environments. This can make it expensive to purchase and manage a unique backup agent for each individual physical and virtual (agent-based) server compared to using a single agent to manage and back up many (agentless) virtual machines.

As we will see in more detail below, agent-based backup works by installing one backup software (agent) on each virtual machine. In contrast, agentless backup does not actually remove the agent from the image, but rather centralizes the backup functions by performing a disk-to-disk backup from an administration point. This retains the benefits of agent-based backup without the cost of installing an agent on each server.

There are certain circumstances that call for agent-based backups versus agentless backups, and as with all computing processes, each method has trade-offs. Here is a summary of these two approaches to backing up virtual machines.

What are Agent-Based Backups?

Agent-based backup products require the user to install software on every machine they want to protect. The agent software resides at the kernel level in a secure system, so it can easily detect block level changes on the machine. Because agent-based backup does not require scanning the entire file system to detect changes for incremental backups, it can be more efficient than agentless backup for physical machines.

However, the disadvantage of agent-based backup is that they rely on local processing resources to take the backup and send it to the backup destination. For this reason, the backup process can affect application performance if the protected server does not have the processing power to perform the backup along with the workloads. This is usually not a problem if the server has enough resources, but it’s something to keep in mind. When system administrators are dealing with a mixed environment with physical and virtual servers, the physical servers usually require agent-based backup.

From there, they can choose between non-images or image-based backups.

What is Non-Image Based Backup?

Non-image based backups cannot restore the entire system, but they can perform granular file restores. This is helpful as long as the operating system (OS) is unaffected. In the event that the (OS) is corrupted or encrypted by ransomware, administrators have to reinstall the environment before they can use non-image-based backups to restore the files.

What is Image-Based Backup?

Image-based backup systems take a snapshot of all disks or volumes on a server, eliminating the need to reinstall the operating system and restore special files to replicate the previous system. This ensures fast full recovery, often within minutes, without the risk of losing important files, which can happen with non-imaging backups, i.e. only at the file level. Today, most image-based backup systems offer the benefits of granular file recovery, as do imageless systems.

Additionally, image-based backups can create incremental backups, which means that only the portion of the server that has changed since the last backup is saved. Incremental backups have helped image-based backup systems become the standard for physical server disaster recovery.

What are Agentless Backups?

Agentless backup does not require users to install an agent on individual server(s), making them easier to implement and monitor. This is especially important in virtual environments hosting many production machines. In this case, VMs can start so easily that they may not be protected when using agent-based backup because the backup agent was never installed.

In the case of agentless, this is not a problem, since agent analytics is centralized from a single source and can be deployed over a network in multiple environments. Where agentless backups really shine is in virtual machine infrastructure. Good agentless backup software uses changed block tracking (CBT) integrated with the hypervisor (CBT identifies blocks of data that have been changed or are in use). Get more value with agentless backup with virtual storage, which includes ways to stream data from the hypervisor to the data warehouse without using network traffic. Therefore, there is no need to worry about IOPS on the local VM or use the network bandwidth that is best used for real production processes.

Do Agentless Backups Cost Less than Agent-Based Backups?

As agentless backups do not need to be installed on each individual machine, they do not require individual licenses per machine which makes them less costly. However, pricing varies depending on the backup software vendor.

Benefits of Agentless Backups

Data centers are hosting virtual machines in increasing numbers. This makes agentless backup increasingly practical due to its benefits for virtualized networks that host many and ever-changing virtual machines.

Easier administration – Agentless centralized systems allow administrators to manage each virtual machine from a single control panel and view backup across the entire network.

Once the backup administrator has determined which machines and network data needs to be backed up, the assigned data is passed to the backup destination by the network agent. Thus, the recovery process is also simplified.

Compatibility – Almost all modern operating systems, applications, email servers, and databases are support agentless backups.

Enhanced Security – With agentless backup, protected resources do not need to be directly accessible from the target backup device or archive. This limits the attack vectors that attackers can target.

Snapshot Support – Snapshot technology is supported by agentless backup, which creates a point-in-time complete copy of a virtualized server or virtual machine. This snapshot recovery capability means applications can continue to run without data loss. As a result, system admins can more easily ensure application consistency, which helps achieve business continuity goals. Because the snapshot data remains uncompressed for archiving, it can be quickly restored.

Improved control – Policy-based management is a natural complement to agentless backup, allowing you to better manage backup and recovery in less time. Some virtualization software provides built-in support for agentless backup, such as the VMware vSphere Data Warehouse API for data protection. This API provides agentless backup without the need to install additional backup software.

Backup without using a local network – Agentless backup is more efficient in non-LAN backup environments where backup and restore is done over a storage area network rather than a LAN. For example, this functionality is automatically provided in VMWare vSphere using the VMware vSphere storage APIs.

Cost reduction – Agentless backup means lower costs. In addition to significantly reducing the cost of purchasing and licensing, having an individual agent-based backup for each virtual machine on the network reduces CPU and bandwidth consumption and reduces communications.


Agentless vs. Agent-Based Backup: Which Should You Choose? There are many factors to consider when choosing between agentless and agent-based backups. For maximum flexibility, you should look for a BCDR solution that supports both.

Looking to set up agentless backups for your critical workloads? Contact StoneFly pre-sales engineers today!

Recent Posts

Comparing High Availability vs Fault Tolerance vs Disaster Recovery

Comparing High Availability vs Fault Tolerance vs Disaster Recovery

High availability, fault tolerance, and disaster recovery are pivotal concepts that enable organizations to achieve uninterrupted service delivery, protect critical data, and swiftly bounce back from unexpected incidents. By implementing these concepts effectively,...

BaaS vs RaaS vs DRaaS Comparison – Which is Best

BaaS vs RaaS vs DRaaS Comparison – Which is Best

Disaster recovery is critical for any organization, but it can be particularly challenging for small and medium-sized businesses that lack the resources to maintain secondary data centers. To address this challenge, disaster recovery vendors offer cloud-based backup...

How to Size Air-gapped and Immutable Storage for Veeam v12

How to Size Air-gapped and Immutable Storage for Veeam v12

Properly sizing storage is a critical aspect of any IT infrastructure, but it becomes even more crucial when it comes to backup and disaster recovery. Veeam v12 is an excellent software for data protection, but to function efficiently, it requires the right amount of...

How to Calculate and Improve Recovery Time and Point Objectives

How to Calculate and Improve Recovery Time and Point Objectives

Disasters can strike anytime, anywhere, and cause devastating consequences for businesses, especially when it comes to data loss or unavailability. To mitigate these risks, businesses need to have a disaster recovery plan in place that includes Recovery Time...

You May Also Like

BaaS vs RaaS vs DRaaS Comparison – Which is Best

BaaS vs RaaS vs DRaaS Comparison – Which is Best

Are you confused about whether your business needs Backup as a Service (BaaS), Recovery as a Service (RaaS), or Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)? With so many options available, it can be overwhelming to choose the right one that fits your organization’s specific needs. This article breaks down each service separately, compares them, and helps you make an informed decision on which one to choose for your business.

read more

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news, updates, and promotions from StoneFly.

Please Confirm your subscription from the email