A Comparison between AWS S3 Infrequent Access and Azure Cool Blob Storage

Amazon web services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure offer tiered object storage, particularly directed at protecting stored data. AWS S3 Infrequent Access (S3-IA) and Azure Cool Blob Storage (CBS) cloud storage tiers are designed for infrequently-accessed workloads.

Since StoneFly provides backup for on-premise physical/virtual servers, cloud servers and other endpoints to Azure cloud and Amazon AWS cloud, here is an unbiased and informative comparison between the two object storage tiers.

Both AWS S3-IA and Azure CBS are best for cold-tier or infrequently-access data where performance and latency are important. These tiers offer the best prices for long-term storage but they charge more for access. This makes them ideal for long term media storage, backup and disaster recovery. In the following blog post, we will look into the features of AWS S3-IA and Azure CBS and see how they compare on the following aspects: Granularity, Availability, Performance, Cloud Scalability, Security, Regional Availability, Changing Access Tier, Quirks and Considerations, and Pricing.

How Granular are Azure Cool Blob and AWS S3-IA

Granularity or graininess is the quality of being grainy or in other words, how detailed a certain thing is. In terms of AWS and Azure, it pertains to their storage and processing of data and information. Both AWS S3-IA and Azure CBS permit the user to set some information to lower access frequency while some to normal frequency. However, the granularity at which you can set it varies.

AWS has an “object” oriented storage tier setting while Azure has a “Storage account” oriented storage tier setting. In other words, in AWS an object can be set to use S3 or S3-IA while in Azure an entire storage account must be set to use Cool or Hot storage blobs. This implies that Azure doesn’t treat individual blobs (or objects) rather the entire storage account containing the blobs is set to cool (for low-frequency access).

Note: Changing access frequencies does incur costs for both Azure and AWS

Service License Agreements (SLAs) of Azure Cool Blob and AWS S3-IA

Azure and AWS provide their customers with a Service license agreement (SLA) for when the service is not available. This SLA provides billing credit when the service is not available beyond a certain threshold in a given month. In comparison to the SLA offered for the higher frequency access, this SLA is lower. 

LRS: Locally Redundant Storage           

ZRS: Zone Redundant Storage               

GRS: Geo Redundant Storage

Both AWS S3-IA and Azure Cool Blob Storage offer 10% billing credit for less than 99% availability and 25% billing credit for less than 98% availability. However, Azure Cool Blob Storage sets the bar higher for their 10% billing credit, offering it for less than 99.9% availability for their Read Access Geo Redundant Storage (RA-GRS).

Azure Cool Blob Storage and AWS S3-IA Performance Comparison

In terms of latency and bandwidth, both Azure Cool Blob Storage and AWS S3-IA are similar to the higher access frequency tier.

Here are the performance details for Azure Cool Blob Storage:

• For a single blob: Up to 60 MegaBytes (MBs) per second, or up to 500 requests per second.
• Total request rate per storage account: Up to 20,000 IOPS at 1KiloByte (KB) block size.
• LRS: 20 Gigabytes (GBs) per second ingress, 30 GBs per second egress per account.
• GRS: 10 GBs per second ingress, 20 GBs per second egress per account.

The performance details for AWS S3-IA are as follows: 

How Scalable are Azure Cool Blob and AWS S3-IA

Both AWS S3-IA and Azure Cool Blob Storage appear to be scalable as the higher frequency tier. The maximum possible scalability of AWS S3 and Azure Hot Blob storage is as follows:

Azure Cool Blob Storage Scalability:

Azure Cool Blob Storage presents robust capabilities, allowing for expansive data management within a storage account. The scalability features include:

• Maximum size of a single blob container: Aligned with the maximum storage account capacity, providing a vast canvas for data storage.
• Maximum number of blocks in a block blob or append blob: Accommodating up to 50,000 blocks, offering granular control over the organization of data.
• Maximum size of a block in a block blob: Reaching 4000 MiB, facilitating the efficient handling of substantial data blocks.
• Maximum size of a block blob: Extending to 50,000 x 4000 MiB (approximately 190.7 TiB), enabling the storage of extensive datasets.
• Maximum size of a block in an append blob: Set at 4 MiB, supporting the seamless addition of content to append blobs.
• Maximum size of an append blob: Scaling up to 50,000 x 4 MiB (approximately 195 GiB), providing flexibility for growing datasets.
• Maximum size of a page blob: Capped at 8 TiB, suitable for scenarios requiring paginated access to data.
• Maximum number of stored access policies per blob container: Allowing the implementation of up to 5 access policies for refined control.

AWS S3-IA Scalability:

In the AWS S3-IA landscape, scalability takes on a different paradigm, emphasizing flexibility and limitless storage possibilities:

• Total volume of data and number of objects: Unrestricted, offering an unlimited canvas for storing diverse datasets.
• Individual Amazon S3 object size: Ranging from a minimum of 0 bytes to a maximum of 5 TB, accommodating a wide spectrum of data sizes.

Note: Azure’s limit of 100 accounts is a soft limit and can change if you request it.

Comparing the Data Security Features of AWS S3-IA and Azure Cool Blob 

The security of AWS S3-IA and Azure Cool blob storage is equivalent to their higher access frequency counterparts. Let’s see how the two compare:

Azure’s encryption of data post flight is still in the preview phase, however, AWS is already providing a reliable server side storage encryption. All other services provided are nearly the same.

Regional Availability

AWS S3-IA is available in all AWS regions. A more clear understanding can be deduced using this following map:

Similarly, Azure’s Cool Blob Storage (CBS) is available in the regions where Blob storage is available (more than half of the Azure regions). Current regions where Azure CBS is available:

Changing Access Tiers in Azure Cool Blob vs AWS S3-IA

Changing Access Tier implies switching between higher access frequency tier and lower access frequency tier. Both AWS and Azure permit these changes but the user is charged for those changes (depending on the change). Let’s take a look at what is charged and what is free:

Changing the access tier in AWS from S3 standard or Reduced Data Redundancy to S3-IA is possible. The change is charged for and also imposes the condition that the object must have existed in its current state for at least 30 days; otherwise, AWS will charge additional fees. To facilitate the change in access tiers, AWS also offers a migration tool called “Object Lifecycle management”. This tool enables you to set policies for migration of objects from S3 standard S3-IA to Glacier based on time or date. The policies are set at the S3 bucket level.

In Azure, the user can change their hot blob storage account to Cool blob storage account without any charges. The transition from a General purpose storage account to Cool blob storage account is not permitted.

AWS does permit you to change your object from S3-IA to S3 standard or Reduced Redundant storage; however, this transition is not done directly. You have to place a S3-IA copy request and S3-IA data retrieval, doing so incurs charges. It is also possible to change from S3-IA to Glacier.

In Azure you can change the frequency tier of an account from Cool Blob Storage to Hot Blob storage, this too incurs charges. The change is applied to the entire storage account and all objects within it. You are charged as reading the entire data in the storage account.

Key Quirks and Considerations in Azure Cool Blob vs. AWS S3-IA

Every software, hardware and technology has its quirks and it helps to know about them before investing in them. AWS S3-IA and Azure Cool Blob storage are no exception.

With AWS S3-IA, all EC2 storage snapshots go to S3 standard first. Where they have to remain for 30 days unless you choose to move them before that in which case you have to pay extra. Another AWS has a minimum object size of 128 KBs. So your object size has to be at least that much, all sizes smaller than 128 KBs are charged the same as 128 KBs for cloud backup.

Azure Cool Blob Storage is currently not integrated with Azure backup vault. However, there are third party service providers who are already providing these services. At this time though, not even the Azure classic deployment model (System Center Data Protection Manager, Azure backup and Azure site recovery) is also not integrated with Azure Cool Blob Storage.

Azure Cool Blob vs. AWS S3-IA – Pricing Comparison

Note: it is recommended that you consult Amazon or Microsoft for pricing, as price structures can change from time to time and from one region to the other.

The term “p10kr” is an abbreviation for “per 10,000 requests”. For easier comparison, pricing is normalized to 10,000 requests.

Conclusion

Both AWS S3 Infrequent access (or lower access frequency tier) and Azure Cool blob Storage are storage tiers that are suitable for cloud backup. It’s the kind of storage where you can store a lot of data that you don’t want to access a lot but when you do want to access it, you don’t want to wait. They both additionally lower the low costs conventionally charged for object storage. So, both of them are good options to reduce backup costs.

The difference between AWS and Azure is that AWS enables you to set the access frequency tier for each object, whereas Azure requires all objects in a storage account. So if you intend to use Azure cool blob storage through the StoneFly cloud connect for backup, it would be a good decision to have dedicated Cool Blob storage independent of the primary storage.

In terms of Availability SLAs, both Azure and AWS are very similar with Azure RA-GRS read requests having an additional 0.9% advantage.

Performance and scalability of AWS S3-IA and Azure CBS are equivalent to their high-frequency access counterparts. This is great news for short backup windows and rapid restores, especially when you need them.

In terms of encryption, both AWS and Azure offer encryption and key management for data pre-flight and in-flight. However, Azure is a bit behind in not offering post-flight encryption.

For the regions, AWS S3-IA is available in all AWS regions whereas Azure CBS is only available in more than half of the Azure regions.

Both AWS and Azure allow the transition from the higher frequency tier to the lower frequency access tier. AWS charges for that per object while Azure does that for free. A good thing about AWS is that it offers an automatic lifecycle management tool.

If we are to conclude the price differences between AWS S3-IA and Azure CBS, that would have to be discussed on a case by case basis. However, both AWS S3-IA and Azure CBS lower the backup costs by using their object storage. StoneFly customers should consider which public cloud service offers the right functionality and cost for their backup target and long term retention needs.

Looking to integrate Azure CBS or AWS S3-IA with your current IT infrastructure? We can help! 

We offer physical and virtual cloud gateway solutions to enable businesses to integrate AWS S3-IA or Azure CBS with their existing IT system(s). Additionally, all of our turnkey storage, hyperconverged, and backup and DR solutions offer cloud connect capabilities as a built-in feature. 

For more information, contact our experts using the live chat feature on the bottom right, fill out the form at the bottom of the page to have our representative contact you, or call +1 510 265-1616 to talk to an expert right away.